Writing research papers discussion
Results and discussion sample research paper
You should only mention limitations that are directly relevant to your research objectives , and evaluate how much impact they had on achieving the aims of the research. One of the most common mistakes that you can make when discussing the results of your study is to present a superficial interpretation of the findings that more or less re-states the results section of your paper. Besides, talents, skills, and experiences of the researchers in different fields ie. The first control should concentrate on the evaluation of the appropriateness of the logic of the manuscript, and its organization, and whether desired messages have been delivered or not. Comparing and contrasting the evidence and results produced by other investigators with your own findings can clarify and deepen your understanding of your research and its unique contribution to knowledge in your field. The aim of the present review is to outline the main aspects of writing the discussion section of a manuscript. Do not introduce new results in the discussion section. One of the important mistakes is refraining from critical review of the manuscript as a whole after completion of the writing process. Otherwise pre-peer review process can delay publication of the manuscript, and decrease motivation of the authors.
However working together in harmony requires assignment of a chief researcher, and periodically organizing advancement meetings.
References to previous research: compare your results with the findings from other studies, or use the studies to support a claim. Limitations might be due to your overall research design, specific methodological choicesor unanticipated obstacles that emerged during the research process.
For example, if your sample size was small or limited to a specific group of people, note that this limits its generalizability. In conclusion, whoever the preferred referee will be, these internal, and external referees should respond the following questions objectively.
A good discussion section includes analysis of any unexpected findings. Avoid using jargon. Previously, similar articles might have been published, however innovative messages, and new perspectives on the relevant subject will facilitate acceptance of the article for publication.
If needed, use subheadings to help organize your presentation or to group your interpretations into themes. University of Florida; Yellin, Linda L.
Each paragraph should contain opinions in favour or against the topic discussed, critical evaluations, and learning points.
Annesley, Thomas M.
How to write a discussion in a lab report
As such, you should always approach the selection and interpretation of your findings introspectively and to think critically about the possibility of judgmental biases unintentionally entering into discussions about the significance of your work. University of Toronto; Summary: Using it Wisely. The reason for this is that during writing process of the main text, the significant study outcomes might become insignificant or vice versa. For example, if the purpose of your research was to measure the impact of foreign aid on increasing access to education among the poor in Bangladesh, it would not be appropriate to speculate about how your findings might apply to populations in other countries without drawing from existing studies to support your claim or if analysis of other countries was not a part of your original research design. This can be framed as new research questions that emerged as a result of your analysis. Ask yourself these questions: Do your results agree with previous research? Indicating limitations of the study will reflect objectivity of the authors, and provide answers to the questions which will be directed by the reviewers of the journal. Follow a logical stream of thought. Another approach concerning this issue is to accomplish manuscript writing process within a week. Note that you can make this decision to highlight specific studies after you have begun writing the discussion section. However, if your findings raise a lot of new questions or issues, consider including suggestions for further research in the discussion section. Bates College; Hess, Dean R.
Azar, Beth. Are your findings very different from other studies?
based on 9 review